Skip to main content

Amber parameter file generation using prepin or mol2?

I am working on a system that closely resembles this :


The oxygen is protonated so that there are three bonds involving oxygen.

I tried to create the prmtop and inpcrd files for this system using antechamber and xleap.

Using Antechamber, if I try to create to parameter files by using prepin file, I encounter lot of problems.

Initially I used a pdb file of the molecule generated using either vmd or molden. But antechamber finds error in running bondtype.

So, I shifted to gabedit to generate the structure and creating its pdb file. This works fine. Atleast antechamber does not get bondtype error here.

But, then, if you try to create prepin file using command:

$AMBERHOME/exe/antechamber -i F.pdb -fi pdb -o F.prepin -fo prepi -c bcc -s 2
you will face errors related to the charge on the system like:

INFO: Number of electrons is odd: 127
      Please check the total charge (-nc flag) and spin multiplicity (-m flag)


As suggested you need to use -nc and -m flags to take care of charge and multiplicity of the system.

Once you take care of this error, your antechamber runs smoothly and generates corresponding prepin file.

We normally directly jump to parameter check.

If you try to do parameter check using command:

$AMBERHOME/exe/parmchk -i F.prepin -f prepi -o F.frcmod

You will most probably end up with segmentation fault error.

If we open prepin file, we might find some errors corresponding to the extra proton that is added on the oxygen.

35  O1    o     M   33  32  30     1.254   121.207  -171.680 -0.227000
36                  X    1   0   1     2.474       nan -9836.530  0.000000

Atom 36 is the one which corresponds to the extra H on oxygen. The bond type, bond distance, angle, dihedral data reported appears all wrong.

If you try to manually rectify this, you may succeed in generating the frcmod file.
But the catch here is if you visualize the molecule in xleap, you will find that the extra proton is not located on the oxygen as we expect, instead it is located on any neighboring carbon, nitrogen, oxygen(basically sp2 or sp moiety with probability to accept a proton).
After failing in many attempts to locate proton on desired oxygen, I took another approach. I tried to generate prmtop and inpcrd files using mol2 files instead of prepin.

Out of experience, working with prepin files is easier than mol2. But in this case mol2 worked well.

Using command:

antechamber -i F.pdb -fi pdb -o F.mol2 -fo mol2 -c bcc -s 2

along with -nc and -m flags for charge and multiplicity,

the mol2 file generated is more realistic. Parameters for all the atoms including the extra proton are well defined.

Parmchk also works fine and on viewing the molecule in xleap, the proton is located on desired oxygen.










Comments


  1. Really good information to show through this blog. I really appreciate you for all the valuable information that you are providing us through your blog. python Online course

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AutoDock Vina protocol: For Molecular Docking

There are many softwares available for carrying out molecular docking calculations. Many of these softwares are paid, while some of them are free. AutoDock is one such freely available software. Earlier, there was AutoDock 4.0 version available. One of the problem with the software was the space it would occupy, if you attempt to do multi docking. Recently, there is another algorithm made available under autodock. It is called AutoDock Vina. This is more efficient, robust and fast algorithm. There are many tutorials available to learn AutoDock Vina including: http://autodock.scripps.edu/faqs-help/tutorial/using-autodock-4-with-autodocktools/2012_ADTtut.pdf and also a video tutorial http://vina.scripps.edu/tutorial.html    But for some reason, few changes or explanation in little detail is always required to make it understandable for a beginner to follow.  Here is a protocol designed in our group, which our Master's student follow to get acquainted to Molecular Docking s

Material Studio - selective molecule movement

So, working with Material Studio is awesome. You get to handle bigger, complicated and even unimaginable system. But I am facing problems in very minute functioning. I recently faced two problems, but managed to resolve on my own. Somehow, tutorials doesn't help in resolving them and you end up doing some exercise on your own to get the solution. Among these, the problem of bringing two molecular structures in one window and then adjusting one molecule by moving it around, while other structure remains untouched, as it is. Actually, this should not be a problem to do. There is a simple way of doing this. Select the molecule to be moved and then there is a symbol (button) to select, which allows you to selectively move that molecule only. This is the same way it can be done in Material studio too.  But among all the dozens of symbols, the new person handling MS, kind of gets lost. So, what he does is check the tutorials, for any help. But the tutorials don't talk about suc

xleap to generate prmtop and inpcrd files

Now that we have the lib file with the information for all the molecules we need to include and also the corresponding combined pdb file, creating prmtop and inpcrd files should not be a difficult task. So, to begin with we have a lib file name: molecule.lib a pdb file for 4 molecules name: four.pdb The  task is to generate a prmtop and inpcrd file. Initiate xleap using: $AMBERHOME/exe/xleap -s -f $AMBERHOME/dat/leap/cmd/leaprc.ff99 In xleap window > source leaprc.gaff # load the lib file by: > loadoff molecule.lib I am not sure but some times it helps to also load the frcmod files we created for the four molecules the information of which is stored in the lib file. > loadamberparams aldehyde.frcmod # Load the pdb file: > P=loadpdb four.pdb You should see some thing like this in the xleap window now: ------------------- > P=loadpdb four.pdb Loading PDB file: ./four.pdb Warning: name change in pdb file residue 1 ;  this residue is split i